IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, C.J. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Thanda Ram Sidar S/o Banshilal Sidar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer - Respondent
CRA No. 595 of 2024
Decided On : 22-07-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of convictions and factual background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding false implication and contradictions (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. consideration of minors' age in legal context (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. determining age of the victim via statutory guidelines (Para 10 , 11 , 16) |
| 5. analysis of kidnapping under ipc definitions (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 20) |
| 6. assessment of rape allegations and evidentiary requirements (Para 17 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. intent and requirement for abduction to prove section 366 ipc (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. final convictions and acquittals (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. order of transmission for trial court action (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) questioning the impugned judgment dated 28.02.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund in Special Session Trial No. H-08/2023, whereby the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellant with a direction to run all the sentences concurrently in the following manner :
| CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| U/s 363 of IPC | R.I. for 5 years and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine additional imprisonment for 1 month |
| U/s 366 of IPC | R.I. for 7 years and fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine additional imprisonment for 2 months |
| U/s 4(2) of the POCSO Act | R.I. for 20 years and fine of Rs. 10,000/, in default of payment of fine additional imprisonment for 6 months |
| U/s 506 Part-2 of IPC | R.I. for 01 year and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine additional imprisonment for 1 month |
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, complainant Mayadhar Sidar (PW-2), who is the father of the victim, lodged a report in the Sankara Police Station on 29.11.2022 that on the night of 17.11.2022, accused - Thandaram Sidar, who is his distant relative, after alluring his minor daughter, aged 14 years, took her away on his motorcycle and after searching for the victim, he went to his house, pacified his daughter and brought her back home. After a few days, on 28.11.2022, when Thandaram again abducted his daughter and was fleeing away, he was stopped by his wife and Dhaneshwar Pareshwar, then the accused threatened them to kill by saying that he would abduct his daughter and take her away. On the report of the complainant, First Information Report was registered in Sankara Police Station under Sections 363 , 506 IPC under Crime Number 217/2022. During investigation, the victim told during interrogation that on 24.10.2022, she and her younger siblings were at home, then Thandaram came to their house, when her siblings went out of the house to play, Thandaram threatened her and established forceful physical relations with her and threatened to kill her if she told the incident to anyone. On the night of 17.11.2022, the accused lured her and took her to his village on a motorcycle. The next day his parents brought her back home. After this, Thandaram used to call her and threaten her, "Come with me, otherwise I will kill your family." After that, on 28.11.2022, Thandaram was again trying to take her away, when her parents caught him. On the basis of the statement of the accused, the offense of Sections 366 , 376 of INDIAN PENAL CODE and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012 was added. After obtaining consent from the victim and her father, the victim’s genitals were examined by the doctor. Vaginal slides and underwear obtained after examining the private parts of the victim were confiscated. The accused was arrested and his medical examination was also done. A visual map of the incident site was prepared by the Police and Patwari. The slides and underwear seized in the case were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for testing. Thereafter, after recording the statements of the witnesses and completing the investigation process, the charge sheet was presented in
The court affirmed the importance of credible evidence in sexual offense cases against minors while upholding the conviction for unlawful abduction but not for rape due to lack of proof.
The prosecution must prove specific intent for abduction under Section 366 IPC; failure to do so results in the acquittal of sexual assault charges.
Conviction for rape cannot be sustained where no signs of sexual intercourse is seen in victim’s body.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the lack of evidence can result in acquittal.
The court affirmed that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence.
Rape – Consent of minor has no legal sanctity.
Charges under Sections 363, 366 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act require proof of inducement or coercion, which was not established as the victim left voluntarily.
Victim of rape being minor, her consent has no significance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.