HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Anushka Yadav, D/o Shri Akhilesh Yadav - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Wealth And Family Welfare – Respondent
WPC No. 367 of 2026
Decided On : 27-01-2026
ORDER :
Ramesh Sinha, C.J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the order/ notification/ letter No. Q-1/ Student/ Counselling/ Sanchishi/ 2026, dated 22.01.2026 issued by the Commissioner, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh, whereby the entire counselling process of the first and second rounds conducted for admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses for the academic year 2025, along with the allotments made thereunder, has been cancelled, and further challenging the application of the amended Rule 11(a) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2025 to already selected candidates, along with the explanation dated 23.01.2026 as well as the subsequent order/notification dated 23.01.2026 intimating a fresh counselling process, on the ground that the same is arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following reliefs:-
“10.1 To issue a writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue calling the records from the respondent authorities concerned for perusal of this Hon'ble Court, if thinks fit in the facts & circumstances of case;
10.2 To issue a writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue quashing the order/letter dated 22/01/2026, issued by Respondent no 3 cancelling the counselling process of the first and second phases conducted earlier for the admission for the year 2025 and allotments made therein, in and all consequences arising thereof and related thereto,
10.3 To issue a writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue quashing the order/letter dated 23/01/2026, issued by Respondent no.3 initiating fresh counselling process of the first and second phases conducted earlier for the admission for the year 2025, in and all consequences arising thereof and related thereto;
10.4 To issue a writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari and declare the application of Rule 11(a) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduation Admission Rules, 2025 as ultra vires so far as it relates to counselling done first and second phases conducted earlier for the admission for the year 2025:
10.5 To issue a writ and/or order in the nature of appropriate writ directing the letter/order dated 22/01/2026 and 23/01/2026 and Rule 11(a) of Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduation Admission Rules, 2025 dated 22/01/2026 may be declared inoperative to the effect of allotment of petitioner and the petitioner to pursue studies with respect of admission taken.
10.6 To issue a writ and/or order in the nature of appropriate writ directing the respondent authorities for application of the Amended Rule 11(a) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduation Admission Rules, 2025 to the subsequent phases of counselling which will be conducted subsequent to order passed by this Hon'ble Court in MCC No. 40 of 2026 dated 16/01/2026
10.7 Cost of the proceedings;
10.8 To grant any other relief deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case for imparting complete and substantial justice to the petitioner.”
3. The facts of the case as emerges from the petition are that, the petitioner is a citizen of India and a permanent resident of the State of Chhattisgarh. The parents of the petitioner are also permanent residents of Chhattisgarh, and the petitioner holds a valid domicile certificate of the State. The petitioner is therefore entitled to all fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India. The respondents are “State” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and are amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
4. The petitioner secured admission to the MBBS course in the year 2016 through CG PMT counselling at Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, under Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences and Ayush University of Chhattisgarh.






The court ruled that administrative cancellations of provisional admissions in medical education must adhere to constitutional principles, and no vested rights arise from provisional allotments under....
The court declared rules creating residency-based reservation for medical admissions unconstitutional as they violate Article 14, ensuring equality before law prevails in educational opportunities.
Reservation of postgraduate medical seats based on domicile is constitutional, supporting local education while respecting equality principles.
The court emphasized the application of Rule 12 (8) (ka) of the M.P. Medical Education (Admission) Rules, 2018, which governs the inclusion of vacant seats in subsequent rounds of counselling.
Admission into Postgraduate Course in Dental Sciences – Undue sympathy would lead to perpetuating illegality and giving premium to students who got admissions illegally.
Rules governing admissions to reserved categories in education must ensure continuity of eligible students, underscoring their rights of access to post-graduate courses.
The court ruled that admissions under the NRI quota must adhere to existing rules, and arbitrary changes post-admission are invalid.
The court affirmed the validity of amended rules limiting eligibility under the ‘Competent Authority Quota,’ which were not legally contested by the petitioner.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.