Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, BIBHU DATTA GURU
Samriddhi Dubey, D/o. Shri Sandeep Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare – Respondent
Judgment :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1 Heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Mr. Manas Vajpai and Mr. Kaif Ali Rizvi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3, Ms. Shreya Pawan Daga, holding the brief of Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 as well as Ms. Anmol Sharma, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondent No. 5.
2 By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks for the following relief(s):
“10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction/directions, writ/writs in the nature of certiorari and declare the Rule 11(a) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2025 ultra virus / unconstitutional being voilative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
10.2 That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction/directions, writ/writs in the nature of certiorari and declare the Rule 11(b) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2025 ultra virus / unconstitutional being voilative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
10.3 That, the Ho
The court declared rules creating residency-based reservation for medical admissions unconstitutional as they violate Article 14, ensuring equality before law prevails in educational opportunities.
The court ruled that administrative cancellations of provisional admissions in medical education must adhere to constitutional principles, and no vested rights arise from provisional allotments under....
Reservation of postgraduate medical seats based on domicile is constitutional, supporting local education while respecting equality principles.
Legitimate classification based on residency for admission into medical programs is constitutional, ensuring local residents benefit while maintaining educational standards contrary to claims of disc....
Domicile/residence-based reservation in PG Medical Courses is unconstitutional, violating the principle of equality under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.
The court ruled that admissions under the NRI quota must adhere to existing rules, and arbitrary changes post-admission are invalid.
Rules governing admissions to reserved categories in education must ensure continuity of eligible students, underscoring their rights of access to post-graduate courses.
Reservation of seats for candidates from outside the State under Rule 6 (c) of the Admission Rules was not violative of Art. 371-D of the Constitution, as it was made in accordance with the condition....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
