IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Sushila Bai @ Dropadi Kurre, W/o. Pradeep Kurre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through District- Magistrate, Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI, J.
1. The present Acquittal Appeal under Section 378(4) of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 29-9-2018 passed by the 1st Upper Sessions Judge, Baloda-Bajar Distt. Balodabajar-Bhatapara in Cri. A. No. 69/2017 whereby the Appellate Court has allowed the appeal preferred by the accused acquitting him of offence under Section 494 of the IPC which was preferred against the judgment dated 7-11-2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baloda-Bajar in Criminal Case No. 1238/2014 whereby the accused was convicted for the offence under Section 494 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for 2 months.
2. Facts of the case in brief are that, the appellant/complainant filed complaint against the respondent No. 2/accused and 4 other persons under Section 494 of the IPC stating inter alia that, her marriage was performed with the respondent No. 2/accused in the year 1999 as per the rituals. They have also been blessed with a female child in the year 2002, but after delivery of their child, the accused started harassing her and ousted them fro
Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. The State of Maharashtra
Smt Priya Bala Ghosh v. Suresh Chandra Ghosh
Prosecution must prove the essential ceremonies of a second marriage to establish bigamy under Section 494 IPC; mere admissions by the accused are insufficient for conviction.
The prosecution must prove the essential ceremonies of marriage to establish bigamy under IPC Sections 494 and 495.
A marriage under Hindu law is invalid unless essential ceremonies are performed; mere evidence of a priest is insufficient to establish validity.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the factum of the second marriage and its solemnization with essential ceremonies, as well as the validity of both marriag....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the factum of the second marriage and its solemnization with essential ceremonies, as well as the validity of both marriag....
A valid marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act can be established without 'Saptapadi'; credible evidence proving a second marriage during the subsistence of the first valid marriage constitutes bigamy....
Specific allegations are required to establish the offence of abetment, and penal statutes must be strictly construed.
Second marriage during the lifetime of a spouse is void under the Hindu Marriage Act; the Chakma community's customs do not exempt individuals from Indian Penal Code provisions against bigamy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for an offence of bigamy under Section 494 I.P.C., the second marriage must be celebrated with proper ceremonies and in due form, and the abse....
The court emphasized the necessity of clear and corroborative evidence to establish charges under Sections 498-A and 494 IPC, reversing the appellate court's conviction due to lack of proof and adher....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.