Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY, AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Leela Verma W/o Heeralal Verma – Appellant
Versus
Heeralal Verma S/o Kamla Prasad Verma – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-wife, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.07.2022 (Annexure A/1), passed by the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, District Durg (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 720/2016, whereby the Trial Court granted a decree of divorce in favor of the respondent, pursuant to the application filed under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
2. In this case, it is an admitted fact that after the marriage was solemnized as per Hindu customs on 20.04.1978 in village Manjan, Tehsil Manuganj, District Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, the parties lived their marital life by staying at the non-applicant's workplace, village Kapsi, District Kanker. The children of the applicant and the non-applicant are Manoj Kumar, Preeti and Roshni. On 05.12.1995, when the non-applicant got a job in Bhilai Steel Plant, both the parties started living together in Bhilai.
3. It is also an admitted fact that the applicant receives a maintenance amount of Rs. 4,500 deducted from the non-applicant's salary. The non-applicant married his daughter, Preeti, on 1 December 2014. The applicant's son, Manoj, married an intercaste woman in 2015 and is l
Cruelty, either mental or physical, can justify a decree of divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act if it causes suffering that prevents a spouse from continuing together.
The refusal to cohabit and unilateral abandonment constitute grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, qualifying as mental cruelty.
(1) Divorce – Irretrievable breakdown of marriage may not be a ground for dissolution of marriage, under Hindu Marriage Act, but it is a ground for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(1a) of ....
Mental cruelty justifies divorce; unilateral refusal of cohabitation and long-term separation erode marital obligations under Hindu Marriage Act.
Trivial marital conflicts do not equate to legal cruelty; however, persistent destructive behavior affecting a spouse’s mental well-being can justify divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marr....
The court upheld the divorce as mutual consent was reflected in prolonged separation, emphasizing the need for permanent alimony considering the parties' financial circumstances.
(1) Cruelty may be mental or physical, intentional or unintentional – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus.(2) A marriage which has broken down irretrievably, spells cruelty to both parties....
The court determined that mental cruelty and prolonged separation are legitimate grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
