IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
BIBHU DATTA GURU
Ashish Rangari, S/o. Deepak Rangari – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate, Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIBHU DATTA GURU, J.
1. Since both the appeals arising out of same impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence, they are being considered and decided by this common judgment.
2. These criminal appeals preferred under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C are against impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.03.2016 passed in Sessions Trial No. 173/2014 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge Durg, C.G., whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-

3. Case of the prosecution in brief is that the construction work of Amrapali Vananchal City, Bhilai was being carried out under M/s Ultrahome Construction Pvt. Ltd. At the relevant time, accused S.K. Singh was working as the Project Head at Bhilai. The supervision of construction quality and monitoring of the work in accordance with rules was entrusted to Supervisor Jitendra Singh, while Satyendra Singh was working as Foreman, Ashish Singh as Site Engineer, and Ashish Shukla as Contractor. For the construction of the said building, mason Kailan, along with workers Bhagwat, Chhabi, Arun, and the deceased Lalit Chaturvedi, were present at the site on the date of incident, i.e., 04
Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Negligence leading to accidental death can attract liability under Section 304-A IPC when safety protocols are ignored despite known risks, as established by credible evidence.
(1) Discharge of accused – By its very nature, discharge is at a higher pedestal than acquittal – Acquittal is at end of trial process, may be for a technicality or on benefit of doubt or prosecution....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and death by negligence, as defined in Section 304 and Section 304A of IPC, respectively.
The duty of care owed by the Electricity Board in hazardous activities and the application of the multiplier method for determining the quantum of compensation.
The judgment establishes the application of the doctrine of strict liability in cases of hazardous activities, the method for computing compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act, and the liability of ....
The court determined that insufficient evidence existed to justify the conviction for death due to electrocution, emphasizing the prosecution's failure in proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of strict liability and the doctrine of 'res ipsa loquitur' to hold the Defendants liable for compensation due to the foreseeabl....
The principle of strict liability and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur were applied to establish the liability of the Defendants for the death of Braja Kishore due to electrocution.
Electricity suppliers are strictly liable for injuries caused by their infrastructure, regardless of negligence, and must compensate victims for losses incurred.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.