SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1474

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Gajjala Mariyamma – Appellant
Versus
Gajjala Seshaiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.Janakirami Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The unsuccessful appellants/plaintiffs filed an Appeal under Sec. 96 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.'), seeking enhancement of the damages awarded in the decree and Judgment dtd. 18/11/2010 in O.S. No.01 of 2004 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Kurnool (for short, 'the trial court'). Appellants are the plaintiffs in the suit, who filed the suit in O.S.No.01 of 2004 seeking compensation of Rs.11, 00, 000.00 towards damages for the death of Gajjalla Chinna Naganna (hereinafter be referred to as 'the deceased'), who died due to electrocution. The respondents are defendants in the said suit.

2. It is expedient to refer to the parties as they are initially arrayed in the suit to mitigate any potential confusion and have a more transparent comprehension of the case.

3. The factual matrix, necessary and germane for adjudicating the contentious issues between the parties inter se, may be delineated as follows:

(a) The plaintiffs are indigent persons with no property except the wearing apparel shown in the plaint schedule. They lack resources to pay the Court fee. The deceased's parents are uncooperative and have been included as def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top