SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
Ram Niwas Sahu S/o Ganpat Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 3369 of 2021, WPS No. 2408 of 2024
Decided On : 10-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ram Niwas Sahu [Appellant-in-Person]
For the Respondents: Kalpesh Ruparel, Prakash Sahu

Eligibility for government employment benefits hinges on service duration and adherence to established policies; administrative decisions must not contravene due processes.

Headnote:(A) Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Service Condition) Rules, 2007 - Writ petitions challenging rejection of time bound pay scale and promotion - Court affirmed denial based on lack of eligibility due to incomplete tenure - Government circulars clarified service eligibility for promotions and pay scales. (Paras 3, 20, 22, 28)

(B) Administrative law - Writ not maintainable for promotion without necessary parties - Delay and laches in filing petitions undermined claims of entitlement - Promotion considered as managerial function dependent on various factors. (Paras 27, 28, 32)

Facts of the case:
The appellant contested the rejections of his claims for a time bound pay scale and promotion after being absorbed into the School Education Department, citing completion of required service years.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed insufficient grounds for the requested entitlements since the petitioner had not met the requisite criteria for either the time bound pay scale or promotional advancement due to service duration and absorption policies.

Issues: Key questions included the eligibility for time bound pay scale based on service duration, the status of prior circulars, and the petitioner's promotion claims given their delayed filing.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that policies relating to promotion and pay scale were firm and that the improper filings alongside non-joinder of necessary parties warranted dismissal of the petitions. Also cited was the principle of not establishing parity without adequate proof.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. common questions in multiple writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the facts surrounding the petitions. (Para 3)
3. regulations on promotion and time-bound pay scale. (Para 4 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. arguments of respondents regarding policy decision. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. procedures and qualifications for promotions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)
6. court’s analysis of service completion for pay scale eligibility. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
7. cancellation of previous circulars examined. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
8. onus of proof and necessary parties in promotion cases. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. conclusion of dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

ORDER :

1. Since common question law and facts are involved in both the writ petitions, they heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.

1.1 WPS No. 3369/2021 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 25.03.2021 passed by respondent No. 3 by which representation of the petitioner for grant of time bound pay scale has been rejected.

2. WPS No. 2408/2024 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by respondent No. 3 by which representation of the petitioner for granting him promotion to the post of Lecturer (Hind) or Lecturer (Mathematics) has been rejected.

3. The brief facts in WPS No. 3369/2021 as reflected from the record are that:-

(A) The petitioner was appointed on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-II (Mathematics) in pay scale of Rs. 4500-125-7000 and posted at Middle School Podi, Surajpur on 29.05.2009 (Annexure P/2) as per the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Service Condition) Rules, 2007 (for short “the Rules, 2007”) and his services have been regularized on 08.06.2011 (Annexure P/8). The department of Finance and Planning, Government of Chhattisgarh issued clarification on 10.08.2009 clarifying the earlier circulars issued by the State Government on 28.04.2008 & 15.01.2009 regarding grant of time bound pay scale to Government employees after completion of 8 & 16 years for members of cadre-A & B respectively and for cadre-C 10 & 20 years. The clarification was sought whether any Government servant who has been directly appointed in the department which is included in the list of recognized department for grant of time bound pay scale then his previous appointment in any of the department or his past service will be counted for calculating the period for time bound pay scale. It has been further clarified that the direct recruited posts will be treated as first appointment for grant of first time bound pay scale only and the incumbent is not entitled to get the first time bound pay scale unless he fulfills the requisite length of service as mentioned in the circular issued by the State Government.

(B) It is case of the petitioner that the State Government vide circular dated 10.03.2017 has issued direction for grant of first time bound pay scale and second time bound pay scale to Assistant Teachers after completion of 10 years & 20 years of service by reducing it from 12 years & 24 years, as such, the petitioner should be granted time bound pay scale. It is further case of the petitioner that the State Government has absorbed the Shiksha Karmi working in various schools run by the Panchayat to School Education Department vide order dated 30.06.2018 with effect from 01.07.2018 on certain conditions which read as under:-

(C) The petitioner filed writ petition before this Court which is registered as WPS No. 966/2021 and this Court vide order dated 05.03.2021 while deciding the case, has directed the Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur to take appropriate steps so far as grant of Kramonnati/Time Scale Pay to the petitioner on completion of 10 years of service as per memo dated 09.10.2019 memo written by Under Secretary, School Education Department to Director, Directorate of Public Instruction. In pursuance of the said order, the petitioner submitted a representation before respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top