IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Ram Niwas Sahu S/o Ganpat Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since common question law and facts are involved in both the writ petitions, they heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.
1.1 WPS No. 3369/2021 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 25.03.2021 passed by respondent No. 3 by which representation of the petitioner for grant of time bound pay scale has been rejected.
2. WPS No. 2408/2024 has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by respondent No. 3 by which representation of the petitioner for granting him promotion to the post of Lecturer (Hind) or Lecturer (Mathematics) has been rejected.
3. The brief facts in WPS No. 3369/2021 as reflected from the record are that:-
(A) The petitioner was appointed on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-II (Mathematics) in pay scale of Rs. 4500-125-7000 and posted at Middle School Podi, Surajpur on 29.05.2009 (Annexure P/2) as per the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Service Condition) Rules, 2007 (for short “the Rules, 2007”) and his services have been regularized on 08.06.2011 (Annexure P/8). The department of Finance and Planning, Government of Chhattisgarh issued clarification on 10.08.2009 clari





P.S. Sadasivaswamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
State of Punjab & others Vs. Jagjit Singh & others
Vijay Kumar Kaul & others Vs. Union of India & others
Mukul Kumar Tyagi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & others
Dr. Akshya Bisoi & another Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & others
Eligibility for government employment benefits hinges on service duration and adherence to established policies; administrative decisions must not contravene due processes.
The court ruled that Shiksha Karmis cannot claim government employee benefits until absorption into state service, holding that prior service does not fulfill eligibility criteria for kramonnati unde....
The settlement of disputes related to teachers’ training and the finalization of the seniority list are crucial for determining entitlement to promotion under the relevant rules.
Promotion - There is no prayer in the petition challenging the seniority list. So, the issue of seniority cannot be gone into.
Seniority of a person who is appointed to a post in accordance with Rules by enjoying all the benefits of regular service are entitled to seniority from the date of appointment.
Delayed claims in service matters can unsettle settled positions, making them unmaintainable without necessary parties involved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.