SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 1059

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
SATISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


SANJIV KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) THE present writ petitions have been filed by the 14 casual labourers working at Swatantra Sangram senghralaya, Red Fort, Delhi under the Archaeological survey of India and is directed against order dated 30th december, 2003 passed by the learned Central administrative Tribunal dismissing the original application No. 2426/2003.

( 2 ) BY the impugned order the learned Tribunal dismissed the said original application, inter alia, holding that the same was not maintainable and was barred by principle of res judicata in view of the decision of this Court in W. P. (C) No. 6900/2002 decided vide order dated 6th May, 2002. By this decision, this Court had allowed the writ petition filed by the Archaeological survey of India and had set aside the earlier order of the Tribunal dated 14. 10. 2001 passed in O. A. No. 719/2001 holding that the petitioners herein were not entitled to regularisation under the 1993 scheme was framed by the government of India in view of the decision of the supreme Court in Union of India and Anr. vs. Mohan Pal reported in (2002) Vol-4 SCC 573 wherein it has been held that the 1993 scheme was one time scheme and not an ongoing scheme and wa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top