SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 625

S.K.AGARWAL
HARPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA, GITA LUTHRA, Maldeep Sidhu, P.R.Thakur

S. K. AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) BY way of this petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. Petitioner is seeking quashing of the condition imposed vide order dated 9. 4. 2003 passed by the Additional Sessions judge granting bail to the petitioner, that he shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned in the case FIR No. 22/2003 under Sections 406/498a/116/342/34 irc registered at P. S. Greater Kailash-I, Delhi.

( 2 ) THE petitioner, who is present in person, submits that he was married to Smt. Usha maniktala, on whose complaint above case was registered. Aliegations against the petitioner are false. The petitioner has joined investigation and paid Rs. 12,00,000/- towards her claim for the unrecovered articles of stridhan, without prejudice to his defence on merits. It is pleaded that the petitioner is an exporter and has to travel abroad, in connection of his business, at very short note. Learned Court, while granting anticipatory bail vide order dated 9. 4. 2003 imposed a condition that the petitioner will not leave the country without permission of the court. It is pleaded that seeking permission involves lot of time for procedural formalities and expenses.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top