S.K.AGARWAL
HARPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) BY way of this petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. Petitioner is seeking quashing of the condition imposed vide order dated 9. 4. 2003 passed by the Additional Sessions judge granting bail to the petitioner, that he shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned in the case FIR No. 22/2003 under Sections 406/498a/116/342/34 irc registered at P. S. Greater Kailash-I, Delhi.
( 2 ) THE petitioner, who is present in person, submits that he was married to Smt. Usha maniktala, on whose complaint above case was registered. Aliegations against the petitioner are false. The petitioner has joined investigation and paid Rs. 12,00,000/- towards her claim for the unrecovered articles of stridhan, without prejudice to his defence on merits. It is pleaded that the petitioner is an exporter and has to travel abroad, in connection of his business, at very short note. Learned Court, while granting anticipatory bail vide order dated 9. 4. 2003 imposed a condition that the petitioner will not leave the country without permission of the court. It is pleaded that seeking permission involves lot of time for procedural formalities and expenses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.