SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 475

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
JOR BAGH ASSOCIATION (REGD) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anshuman Makhija, B.J.NAYAR, Jayant K.Sud, U.Hazarika, V.K.Makhija

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition pertains to leases of Nazul land in favour of individuals. These lands, prior to 1947, were leased out to individuals by the Governor-General-in-Council and, after 1947, the leases were executed in the name of the President of India. The lands fall under the control of the Land and Development Office (Landdo) (respondent No. 2 herein ).

( 2 ) THE lease-hold rights in these lands stood transferred to the petitioners or their predecessors-in-interest. The relationships between these petitioners and the Union of India (respondent No. 1), including the Landdo (respondent No. 2) are governed by the terms and conditions of the perpetual leases. The question in the present petition relates to the charge of damages by the Landdo from the petitioners (leaseholders) in respect of alleged breaches committed by them by indulging in alleged unauthorised construction.

( 3 ) THE prayers, as originally made in the petition, were as under:-

"a) grant a writ, direction or order in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents from recovering/levying damages on the properties of the petitioners without any authority of law; b) grant a writ of man
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top