SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 205

MADAN B.LOKUR
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION INDRAPRASTHA ESTATE NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
N. L. KAKKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.Vohra, GITA SHARMA, Rashmi B.Singh,

MADAN B. LOKUR, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner (DTC) is aggrieved by orders dated 25th April, 1977 and 11th July, 1979 passed by the Additional Industrial Tribunal and the Industrial Tribunal No. 1 respectively in O. P. No. 85 of 1974 being an application under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act ).

( 2 ) THE facts as they appear from the record are that on 4th May, 1972, two Assistant Traffic Inspectors Om Prakash and H. C. Dutta checked a DTC bus for ticketless travellers. Three ladies in a group, alighting from the bus after completing their journey from East Park Road to Fatehpuri, were found to be without tickets. On being asked, they stated that they had given a one-rupee note to the conductor (Respondent/workman herein) who returned 40 paise to them, but did not issue any ticket. On being confronted, the conductor stated that the tickets were lying on the foot-board of the bus. These ladies were immediately taken to a Special Metropolitan Magistrate/mobile Court for being challaned for ticketless travel. The learned MM passed the following order:-

"heard the accused in detail. I am convinced that the accused paid the fare to the conductor but he did not

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top