( 1 ) THIS Revision petition has been filed against the order of the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC ) against the proceedings initiated under Section 14 (1) (e)of the Delhi Rent control Act. In the impugned Order the ARC has, in the carefully structured judgment, considered all the necessary aspects in the eviction petition for bonafide requirement. The interference of the High Court in its revisionary jurisdiction is not called for unless the findings of the ARC are perverse, or contrary to an established principles of law. It should be borne in mind that the Legislature has found wisdom in the removal of rights of Appeal, in the interest of an expeditious disposal of claims in the eviction of tenanted premises on the bonafide need of the owner of the premises.

( 2 ) THE ARC has concluded that the Petitioner/ landlady, namely, Respondent No. 1 is the owner of the premises in question and has rejected the tenant s averment that her brother was the owner. This brother has deposed in her favour and has repulsed this assertion of the Tenant; he has categorically stated that the Petitioner is the Owner. This fact has not even been controve