SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 655

R.C.CHOPRA
S. P. KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL MAHAVIR PRASAD MURARKA – Respondent


Delhi High Court

(May 8, 2002) 2002 (TLS)126925

2002-DLT-97-997 :: 2002-ILRDLH-9-253

S. P. KAPUR Vs. Kamal Mahavir Prasad Murarka

R. C. CHOPRA

( 1 ). This petition under Section 25-B (8) of Delhi Rent control Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" only) is directed against an order dated 3rd September, 2001, passed by learned Additional Rent Controller, Delhi by which the petitioner s application for leave to defend under Section 25-B (4) of the Act was dismissed and respondents eviction petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of the Act was allowed.

( 2 ). I have heard Sh. L. R. Gupta, Sr. Advocate for the petitioner and Sh. V. K. Makhija, Sr. Advocate for the respondents. I have gone through the Trial Court records. The facts relevant for the disposal of this petition, briefly stated are, that the respondent No. 1, claiming to be the owner-landlord of property No. D-281, defence Colony, New Delhi, filed an eviction petition under section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of the Act alleging that the petitioner-tenant was let out the suit property for residential purpose by Mrs. Raj Sondhi, the previous owner of the property. In 1976, this property was sold by Mrs















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top