SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 510

A.K.SIKRI
ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PAL PROPERTIES (INDIA)PRIVATELIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.K.Garg, S.K.Luthra, SANJIV KUMAR

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of possession of the property which is a showroom and bears Municipal No. H-72, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (hereinafter to be called as "suit property" for short ). He has also claimed mesne profits alloging that defendants are in unauthorised occupation of the said property of which it claims to be the owner. In the plaint it is averred that Arya Dharam Sewa Sangh was the owner and landlord of the property in question (of H-Block) Including premises No. H - 72, connaught Circus, New Delhi. The plaintiff had purchased this property from Arya Dharam Sewa Sangh vide Sale Deed dated 31/3/1994 which is registered with the Sub-Registrar at No. 2253 additional Book No. l, volume 8223 on pages 1-249 dated 31/3/1994. Defendants 1 to 3 were the tenants of the suit property and a part of the same has been sub-let to defendant no. 4. The tenancy of defendants 1 to 3 has been a monthly tenancy which commenced on 26th day of each English calendar month and expired on the expiry of 25th day of succeeding English calendar month. It is mentioned in the plaint that defendants 1 to 3 took the premises on rent vide Registered Lease Deed


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top