SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1348

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, ARIJIT PASAYAT, A.K.SIKRI
JAY PRESTRESED PRODUCTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NEMO K.PARASARAN

ARIJIT PASAYAT

( 1 ) DISAGREEING with the views expressed by a division Bench of this Court in M/s. Mire Netting stores and Another vs. The Regional Provident Fund commissioner and Others (1981) L. I. C. 1015, reference has been made to a larger Bench to consider whether section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short the act ) is violative of Article 14 of the constitution of India, 1950 (in short constitution ). In the said case, it was held that in the absence of provision for appeal from the order of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (in short the commissioned ) Section 7-A of the Act was hit by Article 14 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) INTEREST, in view of insertion of Sections 7d to 7p of the Act inter alia dealing with Constitution and functioning of Tribunal to deal with appeal from an order under Section 7-A even otherwise the view expressed in that case is not correct. Mere absence of an appellate forum would not render the provision relating to, adjudication unconstitutional. A similar view was expressed by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in M/s. Gammon India Ltd. etc. v. Union of India and Others AIR 1974 SC 960.

( 3 ) W



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top