A.K.SIKRI, H.R.MALHOTRA
PRANNOY ROY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) INTERPRETATION of the provisions of Section 234a of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the act ) is in question in this writ petition.
( 2 ) THE brief facts are as under :- the petitioners earned substantial capital gains for the assessment year 1995-96 for which the return was due to be filed on 31. 10. 1995. However, taxes due were paid on 25. 09. 1995, i. e. , before the due date of filing of the return, but the return was filed on 29. 09. 1996, i. e. , after a delay of about 11 months. Though returned income was accepted on 29. 01. 1998, yet interest has been charged under the provisions of section 234a on the ground that tax paid on 25. 09. 1995 cannot be reduced from the tax due on assessment. The assessee filed a revision petition under Section 264 of the Act on 09. 11. 1998 before the Administrative Commissioner requesting to delete interest charged under Section 234 of the Act. The Commissioner in his order dated 09. 03. 1999 upheld the action of the Assessing Officer stating that reduction of tax paid on 25. 09. 1995 is not provided in Section 234a of the Act, as it compensates for delay/default in filing of return of income and not
REFERRED TO : V.V.S.Sugara v. Government of A.P.
Siddappa Vasappa Kuri and Anr. v. Special Land Acquisition Offer and Anr.
Commissioner of income Tax v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswala and Ors.
Union Home Products Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.
Dr. S. Reddappa v. Union of India and Ors.
Central Provines Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.