S. P. BHARUCHA, J. S. VERMA, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, P. B. SAWANT, S. C. AGRAWAL
Grahak Sanstha Manch – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
Judgment
BHARUCHA, J. (for himself and on behalf of VENKATACHALIAH, C. J., J. S. VERMA AND S. C. AGRAWAL, JJ.):-Writ Petition (C) No. 404 of 1996. President, Association of Allottees of Requisitioned Premises, Bombay v. State of Maharashtra, originated upon a letter written to the then Chief Justice of India. It was treated as a writ petition and numbered accordingly. On 21st July, 1986 rule was issued upon the writ petition and it was referred to a five-Judge Bench for hearing. Accordingly, it comes to be heard by us. The writ petition, in effect, seeks reconsideration of the decision in H. D. Vora v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 2 SCC 337, which was decided by a Bench of two learned Judges of this Court.
2. While the aforementioned writ petition concerns premises requisitioned for the purposes of residential use under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 (hereinafter called "the said Act"). Writ Petition No. 53 of 1993, Grahak Sanstha Manch v. State of Maharashtra, concerns premises requisitioned under the said Act for commercial use. Therein the petitioners are an association of co-operative societies running fair price ration shops in Bombay in premises requisitioned under the s
explained and affirmed : H. D. Vora v. State of Maharashtra
affirmed : Collector of Akola v. Ramchandra
Jiwani Kumar Paraki v. First Land Acquisition Collector
Chiranjit Lal v. Union of India
relied on : State of Bombay v. Bhanji Munji
referred to : President, Association of Allottees of Requisition Premises v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.