SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 20

A.K.SIKRI
INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT X – Respondent


A. K. Sikri, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT No. 2 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as workman, for short) was employed as Masalchi in the Kitchen of Ashoka Hotel (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as Management, for short) which is managed by the petitioner-ITDC. Chargesheet was issued to the workman in March 1984 alleging that workman remained absent unauthorisedly. Departmental enquiry was held as per which he was found guilty of the charges framed against him and resultantly his services were terminated by the management vide order dated 13th June, 1984. Workman raised industrial dispute challenging his termination which was REFERRED TO for adjudication to the Labour Court (respondent No. 1) with the following terms of reference:-

"whether the termination of services of Shri Boman is illegal and or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?"

( 2 ) ON receipt of reference the Labour Court registered it as ID No. 275/96 (later renumbered as ID 1614/95 ). The workman filed his statement of claim making averments to the effect that he was employed with the management on 17th May, 1975 as a utility worker (Masalchi) and his services were terminate


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top