SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 898

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
STATE – Appellant
Versus
SHAQILA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
amicus curiae, Anil Soni, RAJENDRA KUMAR, S.P.PANDEY, S.P.SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA

Arijit Pasayat

( 1 ) 2nd October Dussehra day of 1987 fell on birthday of Mahatama Gandhi and Lal Bahadur Shastri two of the greatest sons of India and advocated doctrine of "ahinsa". Instead of a joyful day, it turned out to be one of nightmares for the family of Tale Ram. An innocent child who had not even celebrated three birthdays was sacrificed so that a barren woman can get a child; an act of abhorrence difficult to conceive. This primitive belief is unthinkable in. the modern jet set twentieth century; but that. is what prosecution alleges happened. The act is to say the least diabolic in its conception and cruel in its execution.

( 2 ) FIVE persons are said to be responsible for the barbaric act and they are appellants in Criminal Appeals and are the respondents in Murder Reference No. 1 of 2000 which has been made to this Court by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Trial Judge) who convicted each of the accused for offences punishable under Sections 302, 364, 201 and 120b of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short "indian Penal Code") and awarded them death sentence, 7 years rigorous imprisonment, 5 years rigorous imprisonment and life impris










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top