SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 88

S.N.KAPUR
GURSHARAN KAUR – Appellant
Versus
H. B. SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.N.AGRAWAL, Vijay Kishan

S. N. Kapoor, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff, Smt. Guisharan Kaur claims to be the owner of the suit premises No. R-264, Greater Kailash-l, New Delhi comprised of enure Isl floor of 208 sq. yds. of land in posh colony of Greater Kailash. This property was purchased by virtue of Sale Deed dated 21/7/1966 and registered on the same date. Plaint:ff No. 2 her husband was managing the property.

( 2 ) IT is claimed that the defendant being partner of the husband of Smt. Gursharan Kaur was inducted in the premises as licensee on account of friendly relations. However, the defendant refused to vacate the premises. He was called upon to vacate and to pay the licence-fee on the basis of prevailing market rate which was not less than Rs. 10,000. 00 per month for period of three years prior of Filing of the suit. On failure of the defendant to-vacate despite notice, the suit has been Filed for the recovery and possession of First floor of the premises. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is admittedly in occupation and using the suit premises without paying any licence fee to plaintiff No. 1. The plaintiff No. I is widow and her husband died on 10/1/1993. The defendant has delayed in filing the wr






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top