SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1167

A.K.SIKRI
TEJ PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Grover, RAMAN DUGGAL, RAMAN KAPOOR, Vikas Pakhiddey

A. K. Sikri, J.

( 1 ) THERE are 29 petitioners in this writ petition. Their grievance is common. They all belong to the category of `schedule Castes (hereinafter referred to as `sc , for short ). The complaint of the petitioner is that their certificates of being `sc are not considered by the respondents for selection to the post of teachers including Assistant Teachers in Municipal Corporation of Delhi/new Delhi Municipal Committee (hereinafter referred to as `mcd/ndmc , for short) merely on the ground that their certificates are submitted after 30th June, 1998, the last date specified for the purpose.

( 2 ) THE controversy in this case arises in the back drop of following factual matrix.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "nctd", for short) has constituted Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as `board , for short) which is respondent No. 2 in this writ petition. This Board is constituted for the purpose of recruiting people from various user departments in development, selection and recruitment procedure. The Board issued advertisement on 12th June, 1998 in newspapers for various p












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top