VIKRAMAJIT SEN
PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS application under Order 1 Rule 10 has been fjil by S. Gurcharan Singh, son of late S. Patwansingh, through his counsel Shri Kailash Chand Dewan. It is prayed that he should be impleaded as a party in the present proceedings which are for the grant of Letters of Administration with the Will attached, relating to the estate of Mrs. Raseel Kohli, the deceased mother of the Petitioner and her deceased brother, the original Respondent No. It has been pleaded that when the Applicant came to meet his uncle, S. Raja Singh he came to learn, in the course of conversation, of the pendency of these proceedings. He was then informed by his counsel that "he should move an application for becoming a party so that the Will dated 1. 10. 1987 executed by the testatrix Dr. (Mrs.) Raseel Kohli, now deceased in respect of properties mentioned as 7/29, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, and property No. 6-B, Mathura Road, New Delhi that the Applicant is moving the present application before this Hon ble Court for the purpose of determination of the right, title and interest which the Applicant has acquired by virtue of a Will dated 1. 10. 1987 executed in his favour by the testatrix Dr
K.S. Abraham v. Mrs. Chandy Rosamma and Ors.
Raja Ram Adult v. Lakshmi Narain Adult
Inder Chand Nayyar v. Sarvadeshik Arya Pratinidhi Sabha and Anr.
Durga Charan v. Sm. Bhudibala Naskar and Ors.
Elizabeth Antony vs. Michel Charles John Chown Lengera
REFERRED TO : Ramanand Thakur v. Permanand Thakur
Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivandrum v. T.P. Kunhaliumma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.