SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1144

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.LAL, K.C.DEVAN, MAHENDRA RANA, YASMINE TARAPORE

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Order 1 Rule 10 has been fjil by S. Gurcharan Singh, son of late S. Patwansingh, through his counsel Shri Kailash Chand Dewan. It is prayed that he should be impleaded as a party in the present proceedings which are for the grant of Letters of Administration with the Will attached, relating to the estate of Mrs. Raseel Kohli, the deceased mother of the Petitioner and her deceased brother, the original Respondent No. It has been pleaded that when the Applicant came to meet his uncle, S. Raja Singh he came to learn, in the course of conversation, of the pendency of these proceedings. He was then informed by his counsel that "he should move an application for becoming a party so that the Will dated 1. 10. 1987 executed by the testatrix Dr. (Mrs.) Raseel Kohli, now deceased in respect of properties mentioned as 7/29, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, and property No. 6-B, Mathura Road, New Delhi that the Applicant is moving the present application before this Hon ble Court for the purpose of determination of the right, title and interest which the Applicant has acquired by virtue of a Will dated 1. 10. 1987 executed in his favour by the testatrix Dr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top