SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 25

S.N.KAPUR
SURENDER ARORA – Appellant
Versus
P. N. MEHTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Andley, R.K.GUPTA

S. N. Kapoor, J.

( 1 ) HEARD parties Counsel on the points of court fee and the question of the rejection of the plaint in its present form at length.

( 2 ) IN this suit for declaration and injunction, the plaintiff seek the following reliefs:

(A) A decree for declaration may be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants to the effect that the agreement of sale dated 13/3/1994 between the plaintiff and the defendants regarding transfer of defendants right, title and interest under the agreement dated 15/10/1992 executed between them-M/s. Inder Paratap Singh HUF for the allotment of the 11th floor of the proposed multistoreyed building known as `narain Manzil ,23, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi subsists between the parties to this suit.

(B) A decree for permanent injunction may be granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants to the effect that they have no right to transfer any of their right, title and interest in the agreement dated 15/10/1992 mentioned in prayer (a) above in favour of any person other than the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff claims that he is real estate agent and Mrs. Sumitra Chistion 15/10/1992 as trustee of M/s. Satazo trust app









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top