D.K.JAIN, Y.K.SABHARWAL
RAJIV ANAND – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these petitions the main question which falls for determination is about the validity of Section 32-G of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (for short the Act ) as also about the true scope and ambit of this Section.
( 2 ) ONE of the contention urged on behalf of the petitioners also is that Section 32-G applies in respect of dues from an industrial concern and does not cover the case of dues from a surety. Yet another contention urged is that specifying the procedure contemplated by Section 32-G is a condition precedent for invoking the said section.
( 3 ) IN order to appreciate the questions it would be necessary to first briefly examine the scheme of some of the provisions of the Act.
( 4 ) THE object of the Act is to facilitate industrialisation of the country by financing medium and small scale industries. The Financial Corporations have been established as an extended arm of a Welfare State and there can be no doubt that its approach has to be public oriented and helpful to the industry and the lonee but that does not mean that such approach shall cause loss to the Corporations. At the same time, however, the Corporation is required to act fai
REFERRED TO : The Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Gopinath Gundachar Char
Surinder Singh v. Central Government
The Gujarat State Financial Corporation v. Natson Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. A. P. State Road Transport Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.