SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 455

B.GOEL
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Anand, M.P.NANDRAJYOG, SANJAY PODDAR, V.K.Shali

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) BY this order I shall dispose of IA No. 7076/96 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and IA No. 4916/97 under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code Filed by the plaintiff. The first application is for ad interim injunction and the second for release of his two FDRs deposited by the plaintiff in pursuance of the interim order.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has filed this suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 3. 3. 1996 which defendant had entered into with him for sale of his house No. 107, Block-A, Lok Vihar, Pitampura, Delhi for a sum of Rs. 37,89,000. 00 , a sum of Rs. one lakh was paid on that day; the balance amount was payable by 3. 6. 96 at the time of execution and registration of relevant documents of sale by the defendant. Another cheque of Rs. 3 lakhs was also sent on 7. 3. 96 but defendant did not encash it; the plaintiff had called upon the defendant by legal notice dated 24. 4. 96 to complete the sale, after obtaining requisite clearance from income-tax authorities. No reply to it was sent; but vide letter dated 3. 6. 1996 the defendant informed him that he had committed breach and the amount of earnest money was forfeited. The plaintiff has alleged




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top