SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 527

ARUN KUMAR, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
RAM PHOOL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Arun Kumar, J.

( 1 ) THE question for consideration in this appeal is as to what should be the appropriate market value of the land in Village Poothkalan, Delhi as on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which is this case was published on 11th December, 1981. The declaration under Section 6 was issued on 11th April, 1984. The Land Acquisition Collector made his award being Award No. 20/85-86 on 11th November, 1985. By the said notification dated 11th December, 1981 under Section 4 of the Act large tracts of land falling in Village Poothkalan were acquired for planned development of Delhi. The Land Acquisition Collector categorised the acquired land into three categories and offered compensation for the acquired land as under: @5tab = Category A rs. 12,100. 00 per bigha @5tab = Category B rs. 12,000. 00 per bigha @5tab = Category C rs. 6,000. 00 per bigha

( 2 ). The land owners were dissatisfied with the offer of compensation made by the Collector and sought reference under Section 18 of the Act. In this appeal the learned Additional District Judge did not agree with the division of the acquired land into three cat






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top