SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 607

High Court Of Delhi
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Appellant
Versus
SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE PARK PLOT HOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION - Respondent
Decided On : 08/14/1998

Headnote:a) The case debated on the validity of the executive order in regard to which the statement was made by minister in the house under Article 77 of the Constitution of India –The decision of the executive was mentioned in the file however was not communicated – It was held that as long as it was not communicated, it could not be deemed to be a final decision b) It was held that according to Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, the plea that was not raised earlier could not be raised in the letter patent appeal c) The case debated on the applicability of the principle of rest judicata in relevance to the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India – The relief was sought in the suit as well as in the writ petition, but were not similar and cause of action were also different – Hence it was ruled that writ petition could not be barred by principle of rest judicata according to Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 d) The case debated on effect of acquiescence in challenge to acquisition proceedings under Sections 4&6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – The compensation was accepted and reference for higher compensation was asked for without prejudice to right to challenge acquisition – Hence it was ruled that the writ petition was not barred by acquiescence and waiver e) The case debated on procedure for taking possession of the land under Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – It was discussed if the presence of the occupant was necessary or not to effectuate the proceedings – It was ruled under Section 16, power vested with the collector to take the possession after the award is made and the presence of the owner was not a necessity for the same f) The case discussed the factor of discrimination in relevance to withdrawal from acquisition of a part of the land under Section 48 of the Limitation Act, 1908 – A part of the land was released and the other was left – It was ruled according to Article 14 of the Constitution of India, that acquisition was not discriminatory, as there was difference in character of the land g) The case debated on procedure for withdrawal from acquisition proceedings under Section 48 of the Limitation Act, 1908 – A part of the land was withdrawn from acquisition – It was held that the other part could not be deemed to had been released without publication of specific notification in this regard

Dr. M. K. Sharma, J.

( 1 ). By this common judgment and order we propose to dispose of the two Letters Patent Appeals registered as LPA No. 150/1987, LPA No. 6/1988 as also Cross-Objections registered as C. M. 1017/1988. The aforesaid Letters Patent Appeals and the Cross-Objection arose out of the two writ petitions registered as Writ Petitions No. 776/1981 and 2174/1981 disposed of by learned Single Judge of this court on 2. 11. 1987.

( 2 ). Before delving into the merits of the contentions raised in these appeals it would be necessary to give some background facts giving rise to the writ petitions. In 1955 the Central Government issued an Ordinance called Delhi (Control of Building Operations) Ordinance which later on became an Act of Parliament with the same name. By the provisions of the aforesaid Act an authority called Delhi Development Provisional Authority was established for planned development of Delhi, which was later on formed as Delhi Development Authority on 30. 12. 1957. Shri N. N. Verma, who allegedly acquired certain lands through purchase in Village Tatarpur and Chaukhandi, Delhi submitted a layout plan for establishment of a Colony known as Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park to the said authority and sought for sanction of the same. The said authority sanctioned the layout plan by a resolution of 9. 3. 1957. In the resolution the authority sanctioning the layout plan mentioned the area of the colony as 20 acres. Same area came also to be mentioned in the letter of sanction. It may however, be indicated that original sanction plan and the file relating thereto are now not traceable.

( 3 ). In 1959 the then Prime Minister of India directed the concerned authorities to freeze large tracts of land around Delhi to control and root out speculation in land sales within Delhi. On the instructions of the Central Government the Delhi Administration issued a notification of 13. 11. 1959 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of over 34,000 acres of land within Delhi including the land belonging to Shri N. N. Verma. Subsequently a notification under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was also issued in respect of part of such land. The Central Government also took a policy decision that lands of the colonies whose layout plans were sanctioned and informations in regard to which were collected should be released from acquisition. A statement also came to be made by the Minister of the Ministry of Health and Works and Housing on March 10, 1960 on the floor of the House wherein he announced that Government had decided as a measure of meeting acute housing shortage in Delhi that the colonies of the areas, layout/building plans of which had been approved by Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Delhi Development Authority or any other competent local authority might be released from the purview of the Delhi Administration s notification dated 13. 11. 1959. The Minister also spelt out the names of 21 colonies which included the name of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park colony as well. In the said statement the area of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park colony was shown as 1,54,500 Sq. Yds. He further stated thus -

"we are also asking the Chief Commissioner, Delhi to expedite action to release the land of approved colonies from the purview of the notification in consultation with Delhi Municipal Corporation".

( 4 ). On 1. 7. 1960 the Delhi Administration issued a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act for release of the land of 21 colonies mentioned in the said statement of the Minister in Parliament. Under the said notification 20 acres of land of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park Colony was released although in respect of 20 other colonies the entire land with slight variation was released. Number of representations were made seeking release of remaining acquired lands of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park.

( 5 ). It may be stated that notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 13. 1
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top