FAIZAN UDDIN, KULDIP SINGH
Murari – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Faizan Uddin, J.-Leave granted.
The appellants in the appeals enumerated herein above had challenged the acquisition proceedings in respect of their respective lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for purposes of planned development of Delhi by filing various writ petitions before the High Court of Delhi. The said writ petitions were dismissed by a Full Bench of the Delhi High Court by judgment dated December 14, 1995 against which these appeals have been preferred by special leave. Various notifications were issued from time to time under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquisition of land for the public purpose of planned development of Delhi. The said notification covered the land belonging to the transfer petitioners, appellants and some other persons. The transfer petitioners like others had also filed writ petitions in the High Court of Delhi being writ petitions No. 2179, 2178, 2140, 2139, 2197, 2083, 2138, 2144, 2199/1983 and civil writ petitions No. 810-812/1984 challenging the acquisition of their respective lands on various grounds. These writ petitions were pending in the High Court. However, during the course of hearing of writ pet
Bihar State Housing Board v. Ram Behari Mahato
State of M.P. v. Vihnu Prasad Sharma
D.G. Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra
Vajravalu v. Sp. Dy. Collector
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vithal Rao
Chandra Bansi Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Aflatoon & Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi
Uday Ram Sharma v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.