SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 878

C.K.MAHAJAN, Y.K.SABHARWAL
DELHI ABIBHAVAK MAHASANGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Y. K. Sabharwal, ACJ.

( 1 ) THERE has to be an element of public benefit or philantropy in the running of the school. The schools are to be run for public good and not for private gain. The object has to be service to the Society and not to earn profit. The public benefit and not private or benefit to a favoured section of the Society has to be the aim. Keeping these aims and objects in view the schools are required to also follow and comply the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act (for short`the Act ) and the Rules framed thereunder (for short the Rules ) as also the affiliation Bye-laws framed by Central Board of Secondary Education (`the Board for short ). The schools are also required to comply the conditions upon which the land may be allotted to it by a public authority on concessional rates for setting up of a school building and its playground etc.

( 2 ) THE bone of contentions in these petitions is the order issued by the Director of Education. The Director of Education, Delhi, has issued an order dated 10/9/1997 requiring Managements/managers of all recognised unaided school in National Capital Territory of Delhi to observe directions as under : 1. No Registratio
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top