SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 378

R.C.LAHOTI
GHISA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL, S.S.SABHARWAL, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA

R. C. Lahoti,j.

( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of CRs No. 754 to 765 of 1990 the facts wherein are common and the question of law arising for decision is the same.

( 2 ) IT would suffice to notice the facts in Cr 754/90 The petitioner s land was acquired. Under the same notification several pieces of land belonging to several persons were acquired. The Land Acquisition Collector made an award. Several petitioners sought for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as `the act for short ). The references were decided on 1. 2. 1975 enhancing the market value upto Rs. 2200-2500 per Bigha. The petitioners herein felt satisfied and did not go in appeal against the order of the reference court seeking further enhancement. However, a supplementary award No. 50a/96-97 was pronounced by the Land Acquisition Collector on 4. 11. 81 in the case of some other claimants. A reference under Section 18 of the Act arising out of the supplementary award was also decided on 29. 11. 1986 wherein those claimants (other than the petitioners herein) were awarded compensation Rs. 23000/ per Bigha.

( 3 ) ON 23. 1. 87 an application under Section 1






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top