SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 213

M.K.SHARMA
NAV BHARAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Naresh Markanda, P.C.MARKANDA, SUMiT BANSAL

M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) THE petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondent for construction of 656 LIG houses at Jahangirpuri, including works relating to water supply, sanitary work and internal development. As per the agreement entered into between the parties, the work was to commence on 22. 8. 1987 and the date of completion was 22. 8. 1988.

( 2 ) IN respect of the aforesaid agreement, disputes arose between the parties relating to payment to be made to the petitioner and accordingly, the said disputes were referred to the Arbitrator by the Engineer Member of the respondent in terms of Clause 25 of the agreement entered into between the parties. The Engineer Member appointed Shri S. K. Ahuja of the Department of Telecommunication as the Sole Arbitrator and the Arbitrator was specifically directed to give reasons for the award.

( 3 ) THE Arbitrator entered into the reference and accepted the statement of claims and counter statements of facts along with the rejoinder to the counter statement of facts and after hearing the parties made the award on 30. 3. 1994. The Arbitrator filed the award along with the records of the arbitration proceedings in this Court on receipt of whi















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top