M.K.SHARMA
NAV BHARAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondent for construction of 656 LIG houses at Jahangirpuri, including works relating to water supply, sanitary work and internal development. As per the agreement entered into between the parties, the work was to commence on 22. 8. 1987 and the date of completion was 22. 8. 1988.
( 2 ) IN respect of the aforesaid agreement, disputes arose between the parties relating to payment to be made to the petitioner and accordingly, the said disputes were referred to the Arbitrator by the Engineer Member of the respondent in terms of Clause 25 of the agreement entered into between the parties. The Engineer Member appointed Shri S. K. Ahuja of the Department of Telecommunication as the Sole Arbitrator and the Arbitrator was specifically directed to give reasons for the award.
( 3 ) THE Arbitrator entered into the reference and accepted the statement of claims and counter statements of facts along with the rejoinder to the counter statement of facts and after hearing the parties made the award on 30. 3. 1994. The Arbitrator filed the award along with the records of the arbitration proceedings in this Court on receipt of whi
REFERRED TO : M/s. Sudarsan Trading Company v. Government of Kerala
U.P. Hotels etc. v. U.P. State Electricity Board
Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Jagdish Chander v. Hindustan Vegetable Oils Corpn. and Another
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.