SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 837

S.N.KAPUR, R.C.LAHOTI
RAVINDRA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
NATRAJ ALBUMS INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED – Respondent


R. C. Lahoti, J.

( 1 ) WHETHER an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal must accompany the memo of appeal? If the application is not so filed does it cease to be maintainable merely because it was filed a few days after the filing of the appeal? These are the questions of law of day to day recurrence, which arise for decision in this appeal.

( 2 ) THE order of injunction which is under appeal was passed on 24. 5. 96. On 25. 5. 96 an application for certified copy of the order was made. Copy was ready on 28. 5. 96. The last day of filing the appeal was 27. 6. 1996. The appeal was filed on 2nd July, 1996. It was not accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The registry raised a few objections including one of the appeal being barred by time and brought it to the notice of the appellant s counsel. The appeal was returned to the appellant s counsel for removing the defects and refiling the same within one week. The appeal, accompanied by an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, supported by an affidavit, was filed on 6. 7. 96. An additional affidavit in support of the appli













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top