M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK, S. NATARAJAN
Subhash Kumar Lata – Appellant
Versus
R. C. Chhiba – Respondent
JUDGMENT
NATARAJAN, J. :— Both the appeals by special leave have been filed by the same appellant and are directed against a common judgment delivered by the High Court of Delhi in two connected second appeals dismissing the Execution Applications filed by the appellant against the respondents in the two appeals under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act hereinafter). The Execution Applications were dismissed by the Rent Controller but on appeal by the appellant herein they were allowed and the tenant/respondent in each of the applications was directed to surrender possession in a month s time. The High Court, however, reversed the order of the Rent Control Tribunal in the Second Appeals preferred by the respondents and dismissed the Execution Applications. The aggrieved appellant has preferred these appeals.
2. It was the appellants case that she had obtained the sanction of the Additional Rent Controller, New Delhi on 26/27-2-76 and thereafter leased out specified portions in a her property bearing No. N-57, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi to the respondents under separate leases for a limited period of two years commencing from 1-3-76. According to her the rear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.