SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 16

ARUN B.SAHARYA
INDER SINGH AHIUWALIA – Appellant
Versus
PREM CHAND JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, Dinesh Kumar, I.S.MATHUR, Keshav Dayal, S.K.Gupta, VANDANA SHARMA

A. B. SAHARYA

( 1 ) BY this petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act), the petitioner-landlord has challenged an order dated 16th of February 1991 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, dismissing the application filed by him against respondent No. 1 for recovery of possession of Bungalow No. H-4, Green Park Extension, New Delhi under Section 14 (1) (c) of the Act. . he CR. 338/91

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed the eviction application in March, 1986 on the plea that the premises let out to respondent No. l by and under a lease deed dated 2nd of September 1970 for residential purposes are required bona fide by him for occupation as a residence for himself and for members of his family dependent of him, that he along with his brother Harjeet Singh Walia respondent No. 2, is coowner of the premises, and that be has no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation. He is an Indian national a- Barrister practising law and living in Nairobi (Kenya ). His work permit was due to expire. He wants to come back and settle down in Delhi. His family comprises himself, his wife and two sons who also will. come and live with him here. He


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top