SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 267

P.N.NAG
K. D. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
H. L. MALHOTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NANDINI SAHNI, Ravinder Sethi, S.N.MARVAH

P. N. Nag, J.

( 1 ) BY this revision petition filed under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called the "act"), the petitioner-tenant has challenged the order dated-17th November, 1990 passed by Shri L. D. Malik, Additional Rent Controller, Delhi whereby he has dismissed the application of the petitioner-tenant for leave to contest the suit for eviction and consequently the order of eviction has been passed under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant to be stated for determination of controversy are that on 26. 4. 1988 the landlord (respondent-herein) filed a petition for eviction against the petitioner-tenant on the ground that the premes in dispute, i. e. First Floor of House No. D- 21. Hauz Khas, New Delhi, consisting of two bed rooms, drawing-cum-dining, barsati, verandah, kitchen, two W. C. and bath attached, were given on rent to the patitionertenant about 12 or 13 years back on rent of Rs. 1. 000. 00 p. m. , exclusive of water and electricity charges, for residential purposes only. The landlord/respondent is in occupation of two bed rooms besides dining and drawing room on the ground floor of D-21, Hauz Khas, New Delh






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top