( 1 ) THIS Civil revision has been brought under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act against the order May 9,1985, of Shri J. M. Malik, Rent Controller, by which he had dismissed the eviction petition brought by the petitioner on the ground of bonafide requirement of residence covered by clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) IT is, indeed, not in dispute that the petitioner is the owner of house No. E-111, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi. The family of the petitioner comprises of himself, his wife, one son, two daughters and the petitioner s, mother. The petitioner s father, who was alive at the time of filing of the petition, is stated to have died. It is also not in dispute that the respondent was 149 inducted as a tenant on the first floor of the permises for residential purposes in the year 1972. The petitioner alonwith family members is in occupation of the ground floor of the said house which comprises of three bed rooms, drawing-cum-dining room and other amenities. The petitioner s son was studying in Engineering College In Andhra Pradesh at the time the eviction petition was filed but during the pendency of this