SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 26

R.L.GUPTA
ANAND DIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RANJIT KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN BHARDWAJ, NANDNI SAHNEY, P.N.LEKHI, R.K.Anand, S.K.Kaul, Sandip Narain

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of IAS 4224/89 and 8283/90. Plaintiff filed the 1st application under O. 39, Rr. 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code for short) along with a suit for partition of immovable properties, rendition of accounts as also for declaration against the defendants. The second application is moved by defendants 6, 7, 11 and 12 for consolida- tion the present suit with Suit No. 63 of 1975. .

( 2 ) IN the plaint, the case is that plaintiff is the grandson of late S. Datarsingh (ISDSfor short) being son of his eldest son. S. Maninder Singh (SMS for short ). Defendant No. 1 Smt. Ranjit Kaur is the widow of Kanwar Mohinder Pal Singh (KMPS for short), a brother of his father SMS. Defendants 2 to 5 are the daughters of defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 6 is the mother of the plaintiff while defendant No. 7 is the brother. Defendants 8 and 9 are the daugthers of ISDS. Defendant No. 10 is the daughter of defendant No. 9 while defendants 11 and 12 are sisters of the plaintiff. The plaint goes on to narrate that the plaintiff attained majority on 28th October, 1986 and the suit is being filed within 3 years of attaining majority for partition, ren











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top