SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 606

ARUN KUMAR, M.K.CHAWLA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MAJ. K. K. TANEJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.CHADHA, VIPIN SANGHI

M. K. Chawla, J.

( 1 ) THE present Letters Patent Appeal by the Union ofindia is directed against the Judgment dated 2. 11. 87 of the Learned Single Judge,quashing the order of dismissal from service of Major K. . K. Taneja, the respondent herein, by the General Court Martial and confirmed by the Competentauthority under the Army Act.

( 2 ) ALONG with this appeal, the appellants filed an application (CM158/81) u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 19 daysin filing the appeal. The appllants also moved another (CM 157/88) underorder 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code for permission to placeon record the relevant Gazette notification/warrant by way of additionalevidence.

( 3 ) BEFORE dealing with this appeal and the applications, it is relevantto keep in mind a few salient features of the respondents, case as disclosed inhis petition (CWP 1253/78 ). The respondent herein was appointed as aregular commissioned officer in the Indian Army in December, 1965. Thereafterin the year 1967, he was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant and in April 1969to the rank of acting Captain. In the year 1974, the respondent was working asacting Major. While working in































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top