SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 73

P.K.BAHRI
BHUPINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARINDER KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.GUGNANI, K.K.Sud, K.S.BINDRA, Rajesh Batra

P. K. Bahri

( 1 ) THIS petition has been brought u/s 401 read with S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( the Code ) seeking quashment of the order dt. 25. 1. 85 passed by Ms. Deepa Sharma, Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, by whicshe allowed the petition moved by respondent No. 1 u/s 125 of the Code and awarded maintenance to respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 2. This was an ex-parte order granting maintenance.

( 2 ) COUNSEL for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order pleading that no proper service of the notice issued u/s 125 r. w. S. 126 of the Code had been effected on the petitioner and the mode of service adopted by the M. M. by issuance of registered notices and ultimately publication of a notice in a newspaper was not in consonance with the procedure for effecting service envisaged in the provisions of the Code and thus, on the face of it the ex-parte order made against the petitioner was illegal. He has also urged that the newspaper in which the publication had been effected was an unknown newspaper and had no circulation in Ludhiana where the petitioner is admittedly residing and even no copy of the newspaper had been sent at the address of the petitioner























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top