SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 299

B.N.KIRPAL
SHYAM BIHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILA DEVI MITTAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.BUCHAR, KANVAL NARAIN

B. N. Kripal, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent (hereinafter referred to as the landlady ) on 1st March, 1977 filed an application under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for the eviction of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the tenant ).

( 2 ) IN the eviction petition it was stated that the family of the landlady consisted of herself and her two sons. The elder son was married and had one son of about 1 years and the other son was still a student of B. Pharma. It was contended that she was in occupation of only four rooms on the ground floor besides a kitchen, a bathroom and a W. C. and she had one small store room on the first floor. It is further mentioned that one room was being used as drawing-room and another as dining-room. Another room was being used as bed-room by the elder son of the family. The only remaining room was being shared by the landlady and her younger son. It is also alleged that there was no guest-room in the possession of the landlady and guests often visited her. The elder son was stated to be a Charteredccountant and was working as an Accounts Officer in the Indian Oil Corporation at New Delhi. It was alleged that he required a separ





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top