SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 98

RAJINDAR SACHAR, S.N.KUMAR
RAJ CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
SHANNO DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.SANGHI, MADAN LOKUR, P.C.Khanna, RAJIV KHANNA, VINOD BHOBADE

R. Sachar, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated 31. 5. 1974 which he allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1 and remitted the matter back to the Lt. Governor for decision in accordance with law.

( 2 ). The property bearing No. 48-G, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi was put to auction by the Collector, Delhi on 17. 11. 1971 and was purchased by the appellant for a sum of Rs. 47,000. 00. The auction had taken place in order to realise a sum of money cue to Rehabilitation, Finance Administration from M/s. Shahakar Ltd. on account of loan taken by it for which the son of respondent No. 1 had stood as one of the sureties. The sale was confirmed by the Lt. Governor on 23. 12. 1971. The possession of the property was given to the appellant/auction purchaser on 4. 1. 1972.

( 3 ). On 19. 2. 1972 the respondent No. 1 filed an application under Section 91 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act (as applied to Delhi) for setting aside the sale. Section 91 provides for making an application to set aside a sale at any time within 30 days from the date of the sale. The plea of the Respondent No. 1 was that she had come to know of sale










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top