SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 136

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HET RAM – Appellant
Versus
RAM SINGH – Respondent


PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 was the recorded bhoomidar of lands bearing Rect. No. 13 kila No. 24 (3-0), 25 (4-16), Rect. No. 14 Kila No. 21 (4-16), Rect. No. 26 Kila No. 3 (2- 9), 4 (4-16), 5 (4-16), 6 (4-16) and 7 (4-16) of Village Kulakpur, Delhi.

( 2 ) CLAIMING to be in adverse cultivatory possession for a period of 3 continuous years prior to 23. 3. 1990, petitioner filed a petition under Section 85 of Delhi Land Reforms Act,1954 praying that since the period within which the respondent No. 1 could eject him from the land had expired, petitioner was entitled to be declared as bhoomidar of the land in question.

( 3 ) AFTER attempting to serve the respondent by ordinary process and registered post and on noticing that service could not be effected, Revenue assistant directed service of the respondent by publication. After publication was effected, vide order dated 21. 8. 1990, respondent was proceeded ex-parte.

( 4 ) PETITIONER led ex-parte evidence. Vide order dated 25. 9. 1990, Revenue assistant declared the petitioner to be the bhoomidar of the land in question.

( 5 ) ON 28. 12. 1994, respondent No. 1 moved an application under Appexdix VI para 14 of Delhi Lan


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top