SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 575

MARKANDEY KATJU, SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS. – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR – Respondent


MARKANDEYA KATJU, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned Single judge dated 8. 12. 2003 in WP (C) No. 4740/ 2000 allowing the writ petition.

( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( 3 ) THE writ petitioner (respondent in this appeal) had applied for the post of Patwari claiming to be a scheduled caste candidate. He was selected against the reserved quota for scheduled caste candidates and given appointment letter dated 18. 11. 1992 vide annexure C to the writ petition. The petitioner had submitted a scheduled caste certificate at the time of joining duty. A true copy of the scheduled caste certificate dated 23. 7. 1981 is Annexure D to the writ petition. That certificate which was issued by the tehsildar, Sadar, Rampur (UP) states that the petitioner is a Mochi (Chamar) which is a scheduled caste.

( 4 ) ON 4. 3. 1998 the petitioner was issued a show cause notice alleging that he had falsely stated that he was a scheduled caste candidate and he had obtained appointment on that basis. The show cause notice stated that the Tehsildar, District Rampur (UP) made a verification about the alleged schedul
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top