SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1231

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
P. JAYANTILAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
RAMAKANT SANORIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anip Sachthey, B.R.SHARMA, Sanjeev Rajpal


SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) THE Revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Additional rent Controller dated 6. 12. 1999 declining leave to defend the eviction proceedings filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ).

( 2 ) THE landlord claimed in the eviction petition that the property in question was originally owned by M/s. M. L. Sanoriya and Sons, HUF consisting of Shri M. L. Sanoriya and his only son Shri Sajjan Sanoriya. Shri Sajjan Sanoria in turn had three sons, Ramakant Sanoriya, the petitioner in the eviction petition, Shri suresh Kumar Sanoriya and Shri Hemant Sanoriya. All these persons are stated to be residing in various portions of property bearing No. 2/44, Roop Nagar, Delhi. The petitioner, tenant herein is stated to be in occupation of the back side of the first floor labelled as flat No. 2. The premises was stated to be let out for residential purposes and it is stated that, in fact, the tenant is no more even residing in the premises and has permanently shifted to Ahmedabad and the tenancy is stated to have been created in the year 1966.

( 3 ) THE la
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top