SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1946

GITA MITTAL
ASHOK KUMAR MATTA – Appellant
Versus
INDIRA GULATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL AIRI, M.S.Vinayak


GITA MITTAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to incorporate an alternative prayer in the suit for specific performance. In order to appreciate the issues raised in the application, it is necessary to examine the plaint as laid and certain orders which have a bearing on the matter.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 5th December, 1995. The plaint as laid contains specific averments laying the foundation for a claim in alternative inasmuch as the plaintiff in the plaint has stated thus:-

"14. It is, therefore submitted under the above circumstances: (a) That the defendants are liable to be retrained by way of permanent injunction from disposing of or renting out or parting with possession of the said shop and from in any way creating any encumbrances, agreements, transfers, conveyance/sale of the said shop in favour of any third party till the decision of this court. (b) That the plaintiff to have the sale deed of the said premise executed by the defendants in his favour by a decree for specific performance. (c) If for any


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top