SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 56

A.K.SIKRI
RAJENDER – Appellant
Versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT KAPUR, Harish Khanna, MANSOOR ALI, MUKUL DHAVAN


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER is the proprietor of M/s. Rajinder Ice Factory located at Khasra no. 339, Village Dindarpur, Najafgarh, New Delhi. According to the petitioner, he entered into a rent agreement dated 10. 4. 2006 with one Sanjay and as per this rent agreement, Sanjay agreed to run this ice factory as the sole and exclusive owner, user and beneficiary thereof in consideration of monthly rent payable to the petitioner. Sanjay was to run this ice factory at his own cost and risk. This factory was, however, sealed by the SDM on 20. 5. 2006. On 19. 6. 2006, i. e. almost one month after the sealing of this factory, enforcement team of BSES rajdhani Power Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the complainant') carried out the inspection of the said ice factory. This team found smell of Ammonia gas coming from the ice factory, though the factory was purportedly sealed. The factory was, therefore, de-sealed and inspection team found that the factory was being run clandestinely committing theft of electricity. This team had found ice slabs in the factory.

( 2 ) ON the basis of the inspection report of the complainant, FIR No. 583/2006 under Section 379 IPC and Section 138 of the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top