SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 84

MANMOHAN SARIN, VIPIN SANGHI
RAGHUBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.Bhandola, Raman Oberoi


VIPIN SANGHI, J.

( 1 ) PRESENT petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 8th September, 2005 passed by the Central administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in O. A. No. 681/04, whereby the Original Application filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

( 2 ) PETITIONER joined service as Carpenter in MES on 9th October, 1964. He was promoted as a Cabinet Maker on 1st September, 1979. He was further promoted to the Highly Skilled-II category on 18th October, 1984 and to the Highly Skilled-I category on 15th October, 1985. According to the petitioner as per the Recruitment Rules, he was eligible for promotion as Master craftsman in the year 1988 when he completed 10 years? continuous regular service with 3 years? service as Highly Skilled Grade-I. Petitioner states that even though he was eligible, his case was not considered while his juniors were promoted.

( 3 ) IT appears that a Departmental Promotion Committee meeting was held in 1999, to consider promotions, inter alia, to the post of Master craftsmen but the petitioner?s case was not even considered though he was otherwise












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top