SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 863

VIPIN SANGHI
SUSHMA THADANI – Appellant
Versus
YATISH KUMAR SATIJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL BHATIA, DINESH GARG, SUDHANSHU BATRA


VIPIN SANGHI, J.

( 1 ) BY this common order, I propose to deal with the aforesaid applications. Parties have addressed common arguments.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the daughter while defendant No. 1 is the son of late lt. Col. Ram Krishna Satija and late Smt. Bimla Satija. Late Lt. Col. Ram krishan Satija was admittedly the owner of the suit property bearing No. B-44, Defence Colony, New Delh. He had acquired the leasehold rights in respect of the suit property vide perpetual lease deed dated 3. 6. 1978. Lt. Col. R. K. Satija expired on 25. 2. 1991. The mother of the plaintiff and defendant no. 1 thereafter passed away on 15. 2. 1995.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff avers that she has been in occupation of the first floor, barsati and the garage block of the suit property and that she has been residing with her family and parents therein since the year 1971. The ground floor of the property was let out to tenants even during the lifetime of the father. It is claimed that defendant No. 1 never resided on the ground floor of the property, since he was permanently residing in Mumbai and is engaged in his shipping business. After the death of the mother, the ground floor was let out and defendant N





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top