SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 898

ANIL KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KUNDRA SHOES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KHURANA, REKHA PALLI, SHIV KHURANA


ANIL KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of objections by the plaintiff, Union of India under Sections 30 and 33 of Arbitration Act, 1940 against the arbitral award dated 29th December, 1999 passed by the learned Arbitrator which was filed by the Arbitrator and which was registered as CS (OS) 1257-A of 2000 and the petition which was filed by M/s Kundra Shoes under Section14,17 and 29 of the arbitration Act, 1940 before the Award was filed by the Arbitrator, seeking direction to the Arbitrator to file the award and to make the award rule of the court.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts to appreciate the controversies are that the plaintiff floated a tender enquiry and in response defendant offered to supply the stores, namely, shoe canvas, brown rubber soles of different size by an advance acceptance of tender on 30th July, 1984 followed by a formal AT bearing No. WL-3/101/208/2-6-81/63/ii/776/rp/110/coad dated 9th August, 1984. The plaintiff had conveyed his acceptance of tender by letter dated 16th August, 1984 except the Bank guarantee which was furnished on 31st January, 1985. .

( 3 ) THAT despite the acceptance of the tender, the defendant could not deliver the stores in accordance wit








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top